CA3: Possession of gun alone not RS in concealed carry state; evasion was enough, however

Officers had a tip that defendant had a gun on him, but the existence of a concealed carry law did not make that an offense so more was needed. That was provided by defendant’s evasive conduct when he saw the police, so the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion and more than just having a gun. United States v. Garvin, 548 Fed. Appx. 757 (3d Cir. 2013).

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense, and he fled the car as soon as stopped and the officers could see a gun in his waistband as he got out. That was all reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. United States v. Ray, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176655 (N.D. Ohio December 17, 2013).*

In a high crime area of Detroit [apparently so bad the police ride in fours], three of the four officers saw a gun through the thin layer of defendant’s pants, and then he bladed to hide it. That was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Edison, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176923 (E.D. Mich. December 17, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.