Sponsor of bill to test all welfare recipients for drugs supports RSC “constitutionality pledge”

Yesterday I posted this: Raw Story: Congressional bill requires welfare recipients to sign waiver of their Fourth Amendment rights. The bill’s author is Rep. Stephen Fincher of Tennessee. I Googled him and in the first page of articles was this:

Roll Call: RSC Takes Measure of Constitutionality Pledge / Neither Party Excels at Completing GOP’s Constitutionality Form by Daniel Newhauser (April 9, 2012):

The House Republican pledge to justify the constitutionality of each bill they introduce has yielded mixed results one year after the rule was instituted, with even GOP Members keeping their explanations short.

. . .

As a recent example, RSC member Rep. Stephen Fincher (Tenn.), lead sponsor of the bipartisan Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, mirrored Kaptur’s brief statement in explaining the constitutionality of his bill, which was touted by House Republican leadership and signed into law by President Barack Obama last week. The constitutional justification? “Article I, Section 8.”

So, Representative, what is your constitutional justification for drug testing all welfare recipients in the United States? When you come up with one, please tell us how it squares with the Fourth Amendment. I want to hear this rationalization. Also, how will the states pay for this federal mandate?

Smaller government Republican? Keep the government out of our lives? Ha!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.