Prior drug arrests can be a factor in reasonable suspicion; nervousness is not much of one

The record supports the finding of reasonable suspicion in this case, but the defendant’s nervousness is not much of a factor. Prior drug arrests can be. State v. Louthan, 275 Neb. 101, 744 N.W.2d 454 (2008):

An individual’s criminal history may be a relevant factor when determining whether an officer has reasonable suspicion to detain an individual. In Lee, this court held that the officers’ awareness that the motorist had unspecified “‘prior drug arrests'” could be considered as a part of the totality of the circumstances in determining whether there was a reasonable, articulable suspicion which would warrant continued detention pending the arrival of a drug detection dog.

Defendant was “in custody” when he was in the police car after an arrest at the scene of an accident. Rockwell v. State, 176 P.3d 14 (Alas. App. 2008) (applying Berkemer).

An issue not even necessary to discuss in this case still decided for no apparent reason: A citizen informant is presumptively reliable. State v. Timberlake, 744 N.W.2d 390 (Minn. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.