Separate search warrant not needed for forensic examination of computer after initial seizure

After a lawful execution of a search warrant for child porn, the defendant’s computer may be examined later without a separate warrant. State v. Grenning, 142 Wn. App. 518, 174 P.3d 706 (2008):

This is an issue of first impression in Washington. There are no Washington cases dealing directly with the constitutionality of an ongoing forensic examination of information stored on copies of a hard drive that extends beyond the 10-day deadline specified in CrR 2.3(c). However, it is generally understood that a lawful seizure of apparent evidence of a crime using a valid search warrant includes a right to test or examine the seized materials to ascertain their evidentiary value. 2 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH AND SEIZURE § 4.10(e), at 771 (4th ed. 2004).

Paramedic who got defendant to pull over and park the car was not a “state actor,” and the stop was not governed by the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Demor, 2008 PA Super 11, 942 A.2d 898 (2008). (Comment: There was probable cause anyway, so what’s the point?)

Listing a Fourth Amendment issue in a brief but not briefing it is a waiver of the issue. State v. Rivers, 2008 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 7 n. 1 (January 7, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.