OH5: Warrant required for GPS installation on a vehicle

Even though the issue is pending in the Ohio Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court, the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Fifth District holds that a warrant is required for GPS installation on a vehicle. State v. White, 2011 Ohio 4526, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 3742 (5th Dist. September 1, 2011).

Officers were conducting knock-and-talks about grow houses, and at defendant’s girlfriend’s place he and the girlfriend consented to an entry and a search, but he expressly disclaimed any control over the garage or knowledge of who was coming and going from it. His disclaimer was a waiver of any reasonable expectation of privacy in the garage. After a grow operation was found there, a key to the garage was found on defendant. Peraza v. State, 69 So. 3d 338, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D 1988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).*

The evidence showed that defendant’s conversation with the officer was consensual, but he was stopped coming out from behind a house that was not his and he had no connection to. When defendant admitted that he had a knife on him, it was permissible for the officer to conduct a patdown. Oglesby v. State, 311 Ga. App. 615, 716 S.E.2d 742 (2011).*

School officials get qualified immunity for a strip search for drugs that occurred before Safford was decided. V.W. v. DaVinci Academy of Science, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101529 (D. Utah September 8, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.