OH7: Regardless of whether RS or PC was required for stop, state didn’t have it

The trial court suppressed the stop for lack of probable cause. The state argued on appeal that the standard should have been reasonable suspicion. Even applying that standard, the stop was unjustified and the trial court’s order is affirmed. State v. Ward, 2011 Ohio 3183, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2721 (7th Dist. June 16, 2011).*

In an arson case, defendant did not have standing to challenge the search of the vehicle in which he was a passenger. Regardless, the police had a valid search warrant for the vehicle for evidence of the crime. State v. Collins, 2011 Ohio 3241, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2738 (8th Dist. June 30, 2011).*

Defendant stopped by a lone police officer who was outside the car standing on the street was asked for consent to search, and the trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent are supported by the evidence. State v. Fowler, 2011 Ohio 3156, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2665 (10th Dist. June 28, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.