OH8: To stop for hand-to-hand drug deal, officer has to have more than a suspicion a drug deal occurred

Defendant was in a van that stopped on the street, and something was handed to a person who approached the window, and the van drove off. While the officer suspected a hand-to-hand drug transfer, there was no evidence that was what happened, and stopping defendant’s van was without reasonable suspicion, and the motion to suppress was properly granted. State v. Carmichael, 2011 Ohio 2921, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2479 (8th Dist. June 16, 2011).*

Defendant was seen in a car that matched the description of one allegedly involved in a string of robberies. After the car stopped, he fled and avoided the officer. All this was reasonable suspicion. State v. Penn, 2011 Ohio 2918, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2449 (8th Dist. June 16, 2011).*

Defendant’s motion to suppress only raised the lawfulness of his investigative stop, and that was a waiver of the issue of the search of the vehicle. State v. Hill, 2011 Ohio 2968, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2500 (2d Dist. June 17, 2011).*

Officers tried to stop defendant for a traffic offense, and he crashed his car into a police car. Defendant’s search incident claim was not properly preserved for appeal. State v. Lattimore, 2011 Ohio 2863, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2441 (1st Dist. June 15, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.