W.D.N.C.: Lawyer’s state law objection to subpoena to appear at federal suppression hearing was denied

A[n apparent] family lawyer was ordered to appear at a federal court suppression hearing, and his state law objections as to privilege to his testifying were overruled. United States v. Jeremias, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63989 (W.D. N.C. June 15, 2011).*

Based on all the evidence, the stop of defendant, a black male running down the street, was justified because there was substantial evidence to believe he was involved in a robbery that police quickly converged on. United States v. Harris, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64171 (D. Minn. April 8, 2011).*

A search warrant issued after a flyover of a marijuana grow that did not specify open fields on the property was not invalid. And, if it was in open fields on the property, it could be searched anyway. United States v. Burge, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63802 (C.D. Ill. June 16, 2011).*

“Any challenge to this court’s denial of the suppression motion would have proved futile; the failure to further pursue the argument did not prejudice Petitioner. Counsel’s decision not to raise a meritless claim does not constitute ineffective assistance.” Angulo-Hernandez v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64133 (D. P.R. June 16, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.