NLJ: Yale Kamisar on “‘Mapp v. Ohio’ 50 years later”

The great Yale Kamisar: ‘Mapp v. Ohio’ 50 years later / Critics of the exclusionary rule bewail its heavy costs. But the Fourth Amendment itself imposes these costs, in this Monday’s National Law Journal:

June 19 marks the 50th anniversary of Mapp v. Ohio, the most famous search-and-seizure case ever decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Moreover, most commentators believe Mapp has another claim to fame — it marked the beginning of the Warren Court’s revolution in American criminal procedure. (Mapp was soon followed by the much celebrated right-to-counsel case, Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), and then two landmark confession cases, Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966).)

Mapp overruled another well-known search-and-seizure case, Wolf v. Colorado (1949), and held that the state courts must exclude illegally seized evidence as a matter of federal constitutional law. Up to that time, state courts had been free to admit or exclude illegally seized evidence as they saw fit, and about half of them had chosen to admit such evidence. (Federal courts had no option; ever since 1914 they had to keep out illegally seized evidence.)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.