S.D.N.Y.: Disorderly conduct charge arising from illegal stop was suppressed, along with the arrest

Because the stop of the defendant was unlawful, his “new crime” of alleged disorderly conduct during the unlawful patdown was not an intervening circumstance. United States v. Olavarria, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42867 (S.D. N.Y. April 20, 2011):

Here, the Government — which bears the burden of demonstrating that Olavarria committed a “new crime” that attenuated the effects of the illegal traffic stop, see Brown, 422 U.S. at 604 — has not offered evidence that the alleged five-minute altercation between the defendant and the police officers became “‘a potential or immediate public problem.’” Weaver, 16 N.Y.3d at 127-28 (quoting Munafo, 50 N.Y.2d at 331). While the encounter took place on a public street in the Bronx at about 6:00 p.m., the fact that this incident occurred in a public place is, standing alone, insufficient to bring it within the purview of the disorderly conduct statute. …

The Government has offered no evidence that any member of the public observed the incident, that anyone was in the vicinity of the traffic stop, or that the dispute extended beyond Olavarria and the officers. Given that the entire incident took no more than five minutes, it is unlikely that Olavarria’s conduct attracted notice or presented any risk of obstructing vehicular or pedestrian traffic. While one officer testified that Olavarria broke away from the officers and “headed towards the middle of the street” before falling to the ground with several officers, the two other police witnesses — including Detective Dunsing, Olavarria’s principal antagonist — had no such recollection. …

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.