KY: A handcuffing is just a seizure and not necessarily an arrest

A handcuffing is just a seizure and not necessarily an arrest. Commonwealth v. Garrison, 2011 Ky. App. LEXIS 69 (April 15, 2011):

Upon even a cursory review of the above-noted decisions, it becomes clear that our jurisprudence recognizes a distinction between a temporary detention (or “seizure”) and an arrest for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. In the case sub judice, the totality of the circumstances do not support the trial court’s ruling that Garrison was arrested at the moment he was placed in handcuffs.

Defendant was free to go (but not in the officer’s mind, fn. 5), but the officer kept him talking and the subsequent consent was valid. United States v. De Alba-Reyes, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41201 (N.D. Ga. February 17, 2011).*

Typographical error as to the city where the property to be searched was located in the warrant was a technical violation since the face sheet had the correct address, which was searched. “Defendant’s motion to suppress because the affidavit and warrant in toto clearly contained sufficient information for the police officers to ascertain the correct address.” United States v. Scott, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41633 (E.D. Pa. April 15, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.