WA: Gant is retroactive to any case pending when it was decided

Gant was applied retroactively to a case still pending at the time Gant was decided, even though the search occurred pre-Gant. State v. Robinson, 171 Wn. 2d 292 (2011).

An officer approached a group of men on a report of an altercation. All the men stayed to talk but defendant. Defendant’s stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. The officer was aware of the following when calling out to the defendant to stop: (1) the area was a high-crime area to which the officer had been called on at least three prior occasions; (2) the police had received a call regarding an armed disturbance occurring at the area in question; (3) upon arriving at the scene, every individual remained where they were or approached the arrived officers, but defendant began to walk away towards a trailer; and (4) defendant, rather than stopping when the officer asked him to stop, looked back towards the officer and kept walking away from him. This evidence was sufficient to support the reasonableness of the stop under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Stittiams, 417 Fed. Appx. 530, 2011 FED App. 0226N (6th Cir. 2011) (unpublished).*

The record supported the trial court’s conclusion that defendant committed a traffic violation supporting the stop, and that supported the plain view of drugs on the front seat. State v. Hunter, 2011 La. App. LEXIS 430 (2d Cir. April 13, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.