MA: Search of passenger at police station on PC for driver was unreasonable

Defendant was the passenger in a car stopped for probable possession of drugs. The driver was arrested and defendant was handcuffed, told he was not under arrest, and then transported to the police station for further search. All they had on defendant was that he was a known associate of the other defendant and they went to NYC the day before allegedly to buy drugs. Nothing was found associated with defendant in the car on this search. Taking him in violated the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Griffin, 79 Mass. App. Ct. 124, 944 N.E.2d 595 (2011):

Even if reasonable suspicion existed to question and conduct a pat-down of the defendant, once nothing more was learned or discovered, either on him or in the car, the defendant should not have been further detained. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Torres, 424 Mass. 153, 159 (1997), quoting from Commonwealth v. Torres, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 6, 9-10 (1996) (“[O]nce any potential threat to the officer’s safety was dispelled and there was no reasonable suspicion that criminal activity [involving the defendant] was afoot, any basis for further detention evaporated”). Compare Commonwealth v. Wing Ng, 420 Mass. 236, 237-238 (1995) (no automatic right to pat frisk companion solely for being in company of one lawfully arrested).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.