D.V.I.: 911 call with known person involved was RS, and then he pulled away and a scuffle ensued

The officer here responded to a 911 domestic disturbance call involving a name the officer recognized as a troublemaker (for want of a better way to put it), and the officer arrived and saw him on an apartment building parking lot. The officer approached him and touched his arm, and he pulled away and a struggle ensued. Defendant was handcuffed. There was reasonable suspicion for the initial contact, and the defendant’s resistance ripened it into a valid arrest. United States v. Nelson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109244 (D. V.I. October 13, 2010).*

NYPD officers in the housing unit on routine patrol saw defendant sitting on a bench outside an apartment building, and they approached him and could smell he was smoking crack. Defendant broke and ran for the building. He was not seized until he was caught. United States v. Kinred, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109516 (E.D. N.Y. May 18, 2010).*

By the time the officer asked defendant for and got consent for a dog sniff to search the car defendant was driving, he had reasonable suspicion. A dog was brought in for an alert first, and then the car was searched. The court did not address the problematic issue of defendant’s consent. He did not even know who owned the car he was driving, and the paperwork was no help. United States v. Hearns, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109242 (D. S.C. October 13, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.