D.N.M.: Stepfather lacked actual authority to consent, but had apparent authority

Defendant’s stepfather lacked actual authority to consent to a search of adult defendant’s room, but he had apparent authority as far as the officers were concerned. The Tenth Circuit would find he lacked actual authority, but that is not the determinative question. United States v. Romero, 743 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (D. N.M. 2010)* [One has to admire Judge Browning’s industriousness and completeness, but a 157 page opinion here was not necessary. (I judged a moot court with him about ten years ago in Santa Fe.)]

Defendant was on the parking lot of an apartment complex known for its violence and gang related activities. That alone would not be enough for an investigative stop, but the officer had knowledge that defendant had a record of violence and was in La Primera gang, one known for its violence. That was enough. United States v. Miranda, 393 Fed. Appx. 243 (5th Cir. 2010).*

Expansion of defendant’s stop was justified by the smell of burnt marijuana [as if that isn’t enough these days?] and defendant’s inconsistent answers to questions put to him. United States v. Linder, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91558 (D. S.D. September 2, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.