D.S.D.: Mistake as to address in SW cured by attached photographs and prior surveillance

Mistake in the address (3403 v. 3405) in the search warrant was cured by the officer’s detailed description of the place to be searched plus because the officers attached photographs of the place to be searched and they had been there for the surveillance. There was no reasonable probability the wrong place would be searched. United States v. Stiles, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41325 (D. S.D. March 25, 2010).*

Defendant had no Fourth Amendment right to resist fingerprint when he was lawfully arrested. United States v. Williams, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40912 (E.D. Pa. April 26, 2010).*

Inevitable discovery applied to officer’s following footprints from a grow operation in a field onto the curtilage. United States v. Witherspoon, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41049 (W.D. Ky. April 26, 2010).*

Defendant’s 2255 argument that was merely a restatement of his already appealed search issue was barred. United States v. Robinson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126838 (E.D. Mich. February 27, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.