E.D.N.Y.: Jail strip search in presence of other inmates not unreasonable per se

Plaintiff’s jail strip search in the presence of other inmates was not unreasonable, citing five cases. Miller v. Bailey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99245 (E.D. N.Y. December 20, 2007).*

Defendant was found to have consented to a search of his hotel room, not just a weapon as he complained. United States v. Anderson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35650 (D. Minn. March 26, 2010),* R&R adopted, United States v. Anderson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35823 (D. Minn. April 12, 2010).*

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. Considering the interview, it seems apparent that the right person was identified as the offender, and the search warrant is sustained. United States v. Jones, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35622 (W.D. Mo. March 22, 2010).*

Defendant was stopped for having a taillight out, something observable from the video of the stop. The officer was credible when he said that the defendant’s car smelled of marijuana. United States v. Lynch, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35890 (W.D. N.C. March 18, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.