LA3: Violation of nighttime search rule not subject to suppression

Violation of the Louisiana nighttime search rule was not necessarily subject to suppression of evidence. State v. Brown from LA5th is followed. State v. Lewis, 33 So. 3d 1046 (La. App. 3d Cir. 2010).*

The search of defendant’s house occurring by consent within 15-20 minutes of his unlawful stop was not sufficiently attenuated. The three Brown v. Illinois factors ((1) the temporal proximity of the illegal entry and the consent, (2) the presence of intervening circumstances, and, particularly, (3) the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct) favored the defendant. The government’s alternative argument that the defendant was subject to a parole search required the officers have knowledge of the search term, and they did not. The search is suppressed. United States v. Austin, 702 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (N.D. Ill. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.