CA6: Questions during a traffic stop about weapons in the car were not in violation of the Fourth Amendment

Questions during a traffic stop about weapons in the car were not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Defendant admitted that he had a shotgun. United States v. Everett, 601 F.3d 484, 2010 FED App. 0095P (6th Cir. 2010):

Defendant Harvey Everett III was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm after he volunteered during a traffic stop, in response to the detaining officer’s questioning, that he had a shotgun in his car. He appeals his conviction, arguing that the shotgun should have been suppressed because the officer’s questioning on a subject unrelated to his traffic offense violated the Fourth Amendment. This case presents us with an issue of first impression in this circuit: under Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005), and Arizona v. Johnson, 129 S. Ct. 781 (2009), when, if ever, may an officer conduct questioning during a traffic stop that (1) is unrelated to the underlying traffic violation, (2) is unsupported by independent reasonable suspicion, and (3) prolongs the stop by even a small amount? We hold that the questioning here did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and accordingly, we affirm.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.