RI: Protective sweep led to plain view that led to consent

“Jessica Imran breathed her last on the floor of her Pawtucket home after suffering a gunshot wound to her head and neck in the early hours of July 27, 2006, after two men, one of whom was armed, forced their way into her apartment.” You know where this is going. The third party’s consent was valid. A security sweep led to observations that led the officers to ask for third party consent, which was valid because she only “wanted everything to end,” which does not make it involuntary. State v. Shelton, 990 A.2d 191 (R.I. 2010)*:

After careful and independent review of the record, mindful that we must view the trial justice’s findings of fact through a prism of deference, it is our opinion that Ms. Alvarez voluntarily consented to a search of her apartment, and the police’s subsequent search and seizure of evidence from her bedroom easily passes constitutional muster. See Texter, 923 A.2d at 576. Although Ms. Alvarez later testified that she gave the officers consent to search her apartment because she “just wanted everything to end” and further that she was aware that the police had already been in her apartment, particularly her bedroom, when they performed the protective sweep, this merely represents her rationale for providing consent; it does not preclude a determination that her consent was given voluntarily.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.