Fourth Amendment news

Cell phone SI invalid

In the Santa Cruz, a trial judge ruled that a police search incident of a cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment, apparently gutting the case against the accused. See Judge’s ruling that Blackberry search was improper guts guns, drug case by Cathy Kelly in the Mercury News.

Judge Robert Atack Friday gutted felony gun and drug charges against a Larkin Valley father and son, ruling that deputies erred in looking through the son’s Blackberry during a search of his car.

Atack said the son, 25-year-old Reid Nottoli, had a reasonable expectation of privacy for the device and that a deputy did not have sufficient grounds to invade that privacy.

. . .

The search warrant for the property was obtained largely due to photos of weapons in the Blackberry, including a wallpaper image in which a masked man wearing a white robe was holding two large rifles aloft. Deputy Steve Ryan testified that he believed them to be illegal, semi-automatic weapons.

Obama backs taking DNA on arrest and a national database

President Obama gave John Walsh of America’s Most Wanted an interview where the President mentioned that he favored a national DNA database. See Politico. Some find it terribly invasive.

That genie is already out of the bottle–18 states and the federal government already do it. See my January 16, 2009 post about the federal regulation going into effect from April 2008 legislation.

There already is a national database: CODIS, Combined DNA Index System. CODIS was a part of 1994 legislation, and it became operational in 1998. See Wikipedia.

I thought that anybody who has watched CSI in the last eight years already knew about CODIS. It is always interesting to see people getting irate on just discovering that their rights have been lost years ago.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.