KY: Blood draw from unconscious motorist has be with with PC, not just fact of a death

A blood test in a DUI–death case could be performed with probable cause, even if defendant were unconscious. Here, the suppression hearing never established whether there was PC for the blood draw, and the case is remanded for reconsideration. The fact of a death is not enough. Helton v. Commonwealth, 299 S.W.3d 555 (Ky. 2009), Released for Publication January 21, 2010.

Search warrant in a cigarette tax avoidance case covered an 8 year period, and it was not unconstitutionally overbroad; it “limits the search to items tied to crimes charged.” United States v. Wilbur, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9868 (W.D. Wash. February 4, 2010).*

Defendant’s consent to enter his home in a bank robbery case was valid, relying in part on the fact he had been arrested three times before as showing knowledge of his rights. The officers also had reason to believe he was armed, so the search inside the house of a bag was proper under Terry. United States v. Wilkerson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124649 (E.D. Pa. February 1, 2009).*

The findings at defendant’s sentencing of his history of violence and drug abuse justified imposition of a condition of probation that defendant be subjected to searches at any time. In the procedural posture of this case, however, defendant waived appellate review of the issue of who could conduct that such (by any LEO, not just a PO). Twogood v. State, 223 P.3d 641 (Alas. App. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.