SD: Citizen’s arrest by student security for public urination was valid

Student security persons had citizen arrest power over the “public offense” of public urination without violating the Fourth Amendment. State v. Ludemann, 2010 SD 9 (February 3, 2010).*

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense, but he was completely uncooperative in identifying himself, and the stop was in a high crime area. His uncooperativeness justified putting him in the back of a police car. The stop was not unreasonably extended to bring in a drug dog. State v. McClellan, 2010 Ohio 314, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 266 (3d Dist. February 1, 2010).*

Officer’s approaching defendant to ask questions and defendant volunteering he likely had a warrant out on him was not a seizure. Search incident to arrest was valid. State v. Bailey, 154 Wn. App. 295, 224 P.3d 852 (2010):

¶2 Yakima Police Officer James Walker saw James Bailey walking along an otherwise deserted street in Yakima, Washington. He asked Mr. Bailey “if he had a minute.” Report of Proceedings (RP) at 5. The officer had to repeat his question for Mr. Bailey to hear him. Mr. Bailey responded affirmatively and walked toward the officer. The officer questioned Mr. Bailey to determine “if he had business in there or if he was legitimately headed somewhere.” RP at 6. He asked Mr. Bailey where he was going and what he was up to. Mr. Bailey explained that he was on his way to a friend’s house. Officer Walker then asked him for his identification. Mr. Bailey gave the officer his identification and, as soon as he did, advised the officer that he likely had an outstanding warrant. Officer Walker verified that Mr. Bailey had an outstanding warrant and arrested him. The officer searched Mr. Bailey incident to arrest and found two and one-half grams of methamphetamine in his glove.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.