E.D.Cal.: IAC search and seizure claim results in waiver of A-C privilege as to issue

In an allegation of failure of defense counsel to move to suppress because of no standing or open fields defeating any claim, the government seeks and gets a waiver of attorney-client privilege as to the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Garcia, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7114 (E.D. Cal. January 8, 2010):

When a petitioner in a habeas corpus action raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, he waives the attorney-client privilege as to the matters challenged. See Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[A] litigant waives the attorney-client privilege by putting the lawyer’s performance at issue during the course of litigation …”); Osband v. Woodford, 290 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2002). The waiver applies to all information necessary to give the opposing party a fair opportunity to defend. Bittaker, 331 F.3d at 719. If a district court exercises its discretion to allow discovery subject to an attorney-client waiver, it must enter appropriate protective orders clearly delineating the contours of the limited waiver before the commencement of discovery. Id. at 728.

Here, the court finds that movant has waived the attorney-client privilege with regard to any communications between movant and his trial counsel regarding: (1) counsel’s decision not to file a motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the warrantless search of the outdoor marijuana garden; (2) movant’s fluency in the English language and ability to comprehend his trial proceedings and assist his trial counsel without the aid of a Spanish/English interpreter; and (3) whether movant’s trial counsel advised movant of the alternatives available to him to resolve the criminal charges against him prior to trial. By separate order the court will limit the use of information and materials obtained by respondent as a result of movant’s waiver.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.