OH: Standing on a street corner in Cleveland not RS

Stopping defendant because he was standing on a street corner talking to another man, and they saw the police and turned and walked into a store was without reasonable suspicion. There were no furtive movements, and this was only a hunch of criminal activity. State v. Gaston, 2010 Ohio 248, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 185 (8th Dist. January 28, 2010).*

Defendant’s tinted windows justified his stop, and a furtive movement of reaching down in the car justified his patdown after the stop. State v. Elliott, 2010 Ohio 241, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 179 (8th Dist. January 28, 2010).*

Police responded to a domestic disturbance call and were let in. Defendant refused to remove his hands from his pockets, and that justified a patdown. State v. Olden, 2010 Ohio 215, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 165 (2d Dist. January 22, 2010).*

Entry into defendant’s home was justified by community care taking exception where police came to door and knocked repeatedly, and defendant was not roused from the couch. The officer was justified in entering because the defendant appeared unconscious or dead. State v. Hos, 154 Wn. App. 238 (2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.