WY: Locking door on live-in girlfriend who had her key did not nullify her ability to consent to entry

Defendant locked his live-in girlfriend out of the house during an argument, but she had her key. When the police arrived because of the domestic disturbance, they could rely on her claim of authority to enter because she had a key. Baker v. State, 2010 WY 6, 223 P.3d 542 (2010)*:

[*P13] Here, the facts known to the officers at the time of the search support the conclusion that Merck had the authority to consent to a search of the residence. Merck reported a domestic disturbance from her home at the hands of her live-in boyfriend. She expected her boyfriend (Baker) to not answer the door, and told the officers that they could go inside the home, and she unlocked the back door with her own key from her personal keychain. And although a “no trespassing” sign was posted on the property, Merck’s consent stands.

The DUI checkpoint in this case was validly set up. Defendant approached, and the officers smelled marijuana and saw furtive movements as they approached. A frisk based on the furtive movement produced a gun. United States v. Brock, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4951 (N.D. Ind. January 22, 2010).*

KY reiterates that Ornelas de novo review of probable cause is the standard of review, and the trial court’s finding that the totality of the circumstances showed probable cause was correct and supported by the evidence, specifically the comparative analysis of the electrical usage of the defendant’s house and houses in the neighborhood. Commonwealth v. Pride, 302 S.W.3d 43 (Ky. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.