WA: RS only required for bench warrant for violation of probation; no hearing required before warrant issues

Only a well founded suspicion is required for issuance of a bench warrant for arrest of a probationer. Here, the officer had obtained defendant’s ID and let him go, finding out shortly thereafter there was a bench warrant, so he apprehended the defendant and a search incident produced drugs. State v. Erickson, 168 Wn. 2d 41 (2010):

Once a person has been convicted of a crime, that person is subject to the court’s authority. That authority includes the power to supervise an offender conditionally released. Neither the Fourth Amendment nor article I, section 7 of the state constitution requires the court to make a finding of probable cause at every step of the proceeding. We hold that once a person has been convicted of a felony and is on conditional release for that offense, a bench warrant may be issued for his arrest without probable cause that he has violated the terms of his release. Instead, the court needs only a well-founded suspicion that a violation of the terms of the release has occurred before it may issue an arrest warrant. Here, one of the conditions of Erickson’s release was that he notify the court of any change of address. He did not do so and the returned summons provided the issuing judge with a well-founded suspicion that Erickson had violated that condition of his release. We affirm the Court of Appeals and Erickson’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance.

Defendant’s guilty plea three months before Gant waived the search incident issue for appeal. State v. Brandenburg, 153 Wn. App. 944, 223 P.3d 1259 (2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.