IL: Burglary call and open door justified entry by police

Call to the police of a burglary in progress justified police entry into the defendant’s apartment when the police arrived and found the door open. People v. Ferral, 397 Ill. App. 3d 697, 921 N.E.2d 414, 336 Ill. Dec. 800 (2009).*

Defendant’s showing up at the scene of a suspected drug buy did not justify his search because he was completely unknown to the police and there were no facts suggesting that he was involved in the expected drug transaction that was going down. People v. Christmas, 396 Ill. App. 3d 951, 920 N.E.2d 1240, 336 Ill. Dec. 650 (2009).*

Defense counsel’s agreeing with the facts recited by the trial court during the suppression hearing precludes arguing to the contrary on appeal. State v. Corbin, 233 Ore. App. 113, 224 P.3d 705 (2009).*

Police testimony about a protective sweep was more credible and believable than the defense witnesses that there actually was an illegal search during the protect sweep. The defense testimony is just too “speculative and convenient.” United States v. Salazar, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121471 (N.D. Tex. December 31, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.