Fourth Amendment news

Anal cavity bombs? Body cavity airport searches?

I’m sitting at the Newark-Liberty International Airport, and I had a discussion with my wife about two hours ago about a cell phone search case where the prison officials went after a cell phone in an anal cavity by surgery. If one can hide a cell phone there, why not the ingredients to a bomb?

Then, I see on Skating on Stilts, referenced on Volokh Conspiracy, is the comment that the underwear bomber might have had it hidden in his rectum. Frankly, that post was not seen by me until ten minutes ago, but we’re thinking the same thing.

So, full body searches of everybody? On international flights, the flight attendants sound like officers who pulled over a suspicious vehicle: “Keep your hands where I can see ’em!”

TSA will make the public hate flying more than it already does. I fly 30 round trips a year, and I used to roll with it. Now we’ll see how things change. No change at TSA at Newark tonight, but they are supposed to keep us all guessing.

And the President says that there were systemic and human failures in letting the underwear bomber get on a flight to the U.S. Well, Duh! We keep lists but don’t use them. Amsterdam Schipol has good security, but this guy gets through. I’ve been through that airport’s security at least eight times. They know what they are doing.

New Technologies and the Fourth Amendment

On Journal of Online Technology (JOLT Digest): New Technologies and the Fourth Amendment by Eric Engle:

New technologies have made types of searches possible which could never have been envisioned when the Fourth Amendment was proposed to prohibit unreasonable search and seizure. With remote listening, infrared imaging, and, now, wireless technologies, it is possible to detect movements of people within buildings with no discernible physical impact on the surveilled person’s life. Are remote searches reasonable? Do they require a warrant? In my opinion, courts should treat these sorts of remote detection techniques (“surveillance”) as searches subject to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.