SCOTUSBlog–Petition to watch on exclusionary rule

SCOTUSBlog petitions to watch 11-24-09 conference

A potential exclusionary rule case, dressed in RS’s clothing:

Docket: 09-102
Title: Virginia v. Rudolph
Issue: Did the Supreme Court of Virginia properly find, on the facts of this case, that an investigative stop was unjustified under the Fourth Amendment?

Opinion below (Virginia Supreme Court)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Petitioner’s reply
Amicus Brief of the Virginia Assoc. of Commonwealth’s Attorneys, et al.

From the state court opinion, after finding no reasonable suspicion:

When applied to evidence recovered pursuant to an investigatory stop, the exclusionary rule is best equipped to deter stops made not because of legitimate suspicion, but because the stop was motivated by some pernicious reason (such as racial profiling, personal animus, or the like), or by arbitrariness evidencing a genuine abuse of police power. Such a wrongful basis for the stop warrants the application of the exclusionary rule’s severe penalty.

But not all investigatory stops arise from such base motivations. Indeed, the Supreme Court has explicitly recognized that conduct observed by police may be “ambiguous and susceptible of an innocent explanation” and yet still justify an investigatory stop, allowing the officers to “detain the individuals to resolve the ambiguity.” …

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.