FL3: Searching a truant before transport to school was unreasonable for lack of RS

Putting a truant into a police car for transportation to school did not justify a search of her pockets. L.C. v. State, 23 So. 3d 1215 (Fla. App. 3d DCA 2009):

The uniqueness of this case lies in the fact Officer Quintas did not pat-down L.C. prior to directly searching her pockets. Although we appreciate the concern of officer safety, we are aware of no case that stands for the proposition officers can search an individual without having performed a pat-down simply because the individual is being placed in a police vehicle.

Defendant admitted having a gun in a vehicle, and the officer asked for consent to retrieve it, which was granted. Marijuana was found “within inches” of the gun. United States v. Bell, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105712 (M.D. Ga. November 12, 2009).*

Defendant was suspected of DUI on VA property, and she worked there. Investigating officers went to her work area and talked to her and touched her in directing her to come with them. That was a seizure, but it was a reasonable investigative detention on this record. United States v. Hawley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105640 (N.D. Ga. October 30, 2009).*

Failure to raise hands and comply with the officers’ commands with their guns drawn was not submission to a show of authority at that moment. Plummer v. United States, 983 A.2d 323 (D.C. App. 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.