D.Vt.: Gamma ray search of RV at Customs did not require RS

Defendants appeared nervous crossing through Customs in a mobile home into Vermont, and the vehicle was sent for a search (“secondary scan”) which produced ammunition, a holster, and a bulletproof vest. The vehicle was then subjected to a gamma-ray VACIS (“Vehicle and Cargo Inspection System”) which was “anomalous.” A dog sniff occurred, and drugs were found. None of this required reasonable suspicion. United States v. Cybulski, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102600 (D. Vt. October 29, 2009).

The court does not credit the officer’s testimony that the license plate light was out as the justification for the stop, and this is a failure of proof. United States v. Pate, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102902 (S.D. Ohio October 19, 2009):

The Court finds that the evidence presented by the Government does not demonstrate that Officer Bemerer had a “particularized and objective basis” for suspecting Pate of wrongdoing. The only factual evidence presented by the Government with respect to the illumination of the license plate was not sufficiently particularized to this case. Rather, the testimony about this incident was indistinct from what Officer Bemerer does “all the time.” In the absence of testimony concerning specific facts particular to the officer’s decision to stop Pate, the Court cannot conclude that the Government met its burden of establishing that the officer had an objective and particularized basis for suspecting Pate of wrongdoing.

Without telling us what it is, the court concludes there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. Stewart, 352 Fed. Appx. 322 (11th Cir. 2009) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.