NY4: State failed in burden to justify a patdown; officer not called

State failed to prove that defendant’s patdown was justified because of lack of fear for a weapon, but it was harmless here. The officer who conducted the patdown was not even called as a witness. People v Lazcano, 66 A.D.3d 1474, 885 N.Y.S.2d 838 (4th Dept. 2009)*:

Here, the People failed to meet that burden. They established that the police were justified in stopping defendant and conducting the pat-down search …, but they failed to establish that the officer who conducted the pat-down search was justified in reaching into defendant’s pocket and seizing the knife. That officer did not testify at the suppression hearing, and the testimony of the officer who witnessed the pat-down search was insufficient to establish that the search of defendant’s pocket was legal …. We nevertheless conclude that there is no reasonable possibility that the court’s error in refusing to suppress the knife might have contributed to the conviction, and thus the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt ….

Marijuana smoke coming from defendant’s car window during a valid stop was probable cause under the automobile exception. State v. Cowling, 2009 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 120 (October 2, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.