N.D.Fla.: GFE applied to pre-Gant search

A search that was valid before Gant should have the good faith exception applied. (See other posts on this issue listed here.) United States v. Owens, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81378 (N.D. Fla. August 20, 2009):

Based upon the principles of the exclusionary rule, I find it proper to apply the good-faith exception to a search justified under the settled case law of the Eleventh Circuit, even though the law was later rendered unconstitutional by a Supreme Court decision. Just as there is no misconduct on the part of a law enforcement officer who reasonably relies on the mistake of a court employee in entering data, Evans, 514 U.S. at 15, 115 S. Ct. 1185, or the mistake of a legislature passing an unconstitutional statute, Krull, 480 U.S. at 349-50, 107 S. Ct. 1160, a police officer who performs an automobile search subsequent to arrest in reasonable reliance upon the settled case law of the United States Court of Appeals, even though the search is later invalidated by a Supreme Court decision, has not engaged in misconduct. United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 2009 WL 2231658 at 7-8 (10th Cir. 2009). As repeated by the Supreme Court in its good-faith exception cases, the exclusionary rule should not be applied to objectively reasonable law enforcement activity.” Leon, 468 U.S. at 919, 104 S. Ct. 3405. Relying upon settled case law is objectively reasonable law enforcement behavior.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.