CA7: Unauthorized driver of a rented truck could show no privacy interest to contest its search

Officer had RS for continuing defendant’s detention until a drug dog could arrive. The dog’s positive alert was PC. United States v. Lopez-Gutierrez, 334 Fed. Appx. 880 (10th Cir. 2009) (unpublished).*

Defendant driver of a truck rented by another with “no other driver permitted” on the rental contract had no REP in the truck to challenge its search. The stop was valid because he was speeding. United States v. Blount, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12502 (7th Cir. May 27, 2009) (unpublished).*

Under the nighttime search rule of Rule 41(e)(2)(A)(ii), a search that starts before 10 p.m. can continue past 10 p.m. without special authorization. United States v. Ming Zhang, 634 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (C.D. Cal. 2009).*

The CI in this case was not anonymous, so less corroboration was required. Officers set up surveillance and watched defendant, and his actions corroborated the informant’s story. United States v. Allen, 623 F. Supp. 2d 998 (E.D. Mo. 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.