GA: Shots fired and door broken down justified emergency entry

Defendant was parked outside a closed gas station at 8 pm. The officer drove around the building and the car was gone. The officer stopped the car, and marijuana was found. Viewing the totality of the circumstances objectively, even though it was 8:00 p.m. and there had been robberies and burglaries in the area, the circumstances did not supply a particularized and objective basis to suspect that defendant’s observed behavior was a precursor to a break-in, robbery, or any other criminal activity on his part. Rudolph v. Commonwealth, 277 Va. 209 (February 27, 2009), cert. denied 09-102 (November 30, 2009).

Officers responded to a shots fired call at an apartment, and, when they got there, they saw shell casing in the common area and the door broken open. They were justified in making an entry under the emergency exception to check for injured persons. Aguey-Zinsou v. State, 296 Ga. App. 319, 674 S.E.2d 366 (2009).*

Apparent authority was not shown. The testimony of two police officers did not amount to evidence that the grandfather exercised actual control over defendant’s bedroom. The officers encountered a closed bedroom door, heard the grandfather say he did not sleep in defendant’s bedroom, and witnessed defendant open the bedroom door. The apparent authority over the bedroom was ambiguous at best. Hubert v. State, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1323 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg February 26, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.