CA11: Nguyen reconsidered, with same result

The 11th Cir. reconsidered Nguyen v. United States, posted here, and came to the same result: District court erred in granting the government’s motion to dismiss under the FTCA for plaintiff doctor’s false arrest and malicious prosecution action. He got a judgment of $1.8M from a jury which is reinstated. Nguyen v. United States, 545 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2008), on reconsideration Nguyen v. United States, 556 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir. 2009).*

Search of defendant’s property while it was in jail property room was not a Fourth Amendment violation under Edwards. United States v. Bell, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8205 (D. Kan. February 4, 2009).*

Search warrant issued 109 days after a single incident crime was without probable cause because it was stale. United States v. Lindsey, 596 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D. D.C. February 5, 2009).*

Defendant was not compelled to stay by the officer’s hand gestures. The door to the car was open, and the officer’s tone was conversational. United States v. Villegas, 554 F.3d 894 (10th Cir. 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.