OH6: Police entry without invitation or exigency was invalid

Patdown produced certainty in the officer that he felt crack and marijuana, so plain feel was satisfied. The search of the car thereafter was justified as an inventory since defendant was in custody. State v. Davis, 2009 Ohio 345, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 276 (8th Dist. January 29, 2009).*

Officer responded to domestic disturbance call, and the defendant’s wife who was calmly standing in the door was complaining about his smoking marijuana in front of their son. The officer, without invitation, entered, and it was unlawful.
State v. Biddix
, 2009 Ohio 384, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 325 (6th Dist. January 30, 2009):

[T]he officer testified only that he saw an open door and entered. There was no suggestion that appellant or anyone else invited him in. Moreover, there was no evidence of exigent circumstances which might justify the officer’s warrantless intrusion into appellant’s home. There was no report of physical violence. There was no suggestion that any person or property inside the apartment was in jeopardy.

District court erred in presuming defendant was seized under Terry. The first question should have been whether the continuation of the stop was consensual, so the case is vacated for reconsideration. United States v. Crandell, 554 F.3d 79 (3d Cir. 2009), rev’g United States v. Crandell, 509 F. Supp. 2d 435 (D. N.J. 2007).

Officers could order a stopped motorist out of his car on a traffic stop. Here, the defendant got out of the car, and baggies of crack fell out of his pants leg. That was a valid plain view. United States v. Cochran, 309 Fed. Appx. 2 (7th Cir. 2009) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.