ND: Consent to look for people permits officers going to the basement

Defendant consented to officers entering his house to look for others that might have been involved in a fight, and that necessarily permitted them to look in the cellar. State v. Uran, 2008 ND 223, 758 N.W.2d 727 (December 16, 2008).*

Under implied consent law, the defendant does not have to consent [but he can refuse]. State v. Salter, 2008 ND 230, 758 N.W.2d 702 (December 16, 2008).*

Defendant was not detained when the officer approached him to talk to him while defendant was parked in his car. There were no lights and the car was not blocked. State v. Isenhour, 194 N.C. App. 539, 670 S.E.2d 264 (2008).*

Officer’s patdown for weapons before a “courtesy” police car ride did not justify a search of the person because the officer did not feel any weapons and it became an exploratory search. The court considers the split of authority on the propriety of a patdown as a matter of course whenever anybody gets into a police car and does not have to enter the fray. State v. Harlan, 2008 ND 220, 758 N.W.2d 706 (December 16, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.