IN: Refuses to adopt minority rule defendant must testify to preserve search issue

Search incident can go to the defendant’s buttocks when there was concern he still had drugs on him, which would have meant the drugs would come into the jail. Court refuses to adopt the minority rule that the defendant cannot complain on appeal of an alleged illegal search unless he also testified at trial. Hendricks v. State, 897 N.E.2d 1208 (Ind. App. December 12, 2008).*

Bell v. Wolfish factors applies to all jail searches and not just strip searches. Powell v. State, 898 N.E.2d 328 (Ind. App. 2008).

Disorderly conduct arrest supports search incident. State v. Hansen, 2008 Iowa App. LEXIS 1251 (December 17, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.