OR: Search of passenger’s purse without justification even by consent was invalid

Defendant who was illegally detained as a passenger in a car could not be asked for consent to search her purse, so the search was invalid. State v. Corbett, 223 Ore. App. 757 (2008):

Defendant argues, and the state does not dispute, that she was illegally detained following the lawful stop for the traffic violation. We agree. When the officer began the search of the car, the officer did not have reasonable suspicion that defendant had engaged in a crime, yet she was not permitted to leave the scene, and the officer was not engaged in any steps relative to the investigation of the traffic infraction. See State v. Highley, 219 Ore. App. 100, 110, 180 P3d 1230 (2008) (illegal stop where defendant was passenger in a car that was legally stopped and record did not support reasonable suspicion that defendant was involved in criminal activity); see also State v. Kirkeby, 220 Ore. App. 177, 186, 185 P3d 510, rev allowed, 345 Ore. 301 (2008) (illegal detention where no indication that officer was engaged in steps relative to investigation of traffic offense).

Further, in State v. Ayles, 220 Ore. App. 606, 614, 188 P3d 378 (2008), and State v. La France, 219 Ore. App. 548, 557, 184 P3d 1169 (2008), we held that Miranda warnings given to the defendants in those cases before obtaining consent to conduct searches were not mitigating circumstances that purged the taint of the initial illegality, based on the totality of circumstances in each of those cases. The state concedes, and we agree, that the circumstances here do not differ markedly from those in Ayles and La France.

During a traffic stop, the defendant rolled down the window and the officer could smell burnt marijuana, and that was probable cause. United States v. Brown, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93919 (D. Mass. November 17, 2008).*

Attempt to link other defendants to a search of the plaintiff’s premises was so far fetched that the defendants were entitled to attorneys fees to defend against it. Morales-Opett v. County of Fresno, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94072 (E.D. Cal. November 6, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.