CA3: Search of somebody else’s e-mail conferred no standing

No argument was provided that public entity e-mails addressed to others that were intercepted gave plaintiff any expectation of privacy. Ferrone v. Onorato, 298 Fed. Appx. 190 (3d Cir. 2008).*

Defendant arrested for robbery was properly subjected to a search incident. Johnson v. State, 999 So. 2d 360 (Miss. 2008).*

Staying past the hotel checkout period (but not past the grace period) did not give the defendant any expectation of privacy in the room. United States v. Reid, 300 Fed. Appx. 50 (2d Cir. 2008).*

Consent to search the person includes back pants pocket. United States v. Dinwiddie, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92726 (E.D. Mo. January 29, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.