UT: Blood was taken without consent

Defendant’s consent to taking of a blood sample was not voluntary, if it was consent at all. She made it clear that she was afraid of needles and her demeanor when a needle was used on her was corroborative of that. She kept offering blood, but not by a needle, so the police essentially took it while trying to assure her that it would be all right. Her failure to withdraw her arm was not a manifestation of consent since she was essentially surrounded by police officers. She was convicted of automobile homicide after cocaine was found in her blood. State v. Tripp, 2008 UT App 388, 197 P.3d 99, 616 Utah Adv. Rep. 12 (2008).*

Citizen informant called police about a possible drunk driver, and gave a detailed description of the vehicle and the number of occupants. When the officer found the vehicle and pulled up next to it, the occupants did not look at him. Then, the vehicle operated well below the speed limit. That was all reasonable suspicion. Cantrell v. State, 280 S.W.3d 408 (Tex. App. — Amarillo 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.