Strip search of arrestee was justified

The court finds reasonable suspicion for a probation search based on a shooting of the probationer and another resident of his house while he was violating curfew. United States v. Webster, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82911 (D. Del. October 17, 2008).*

Officers were following the defendant and saw a hand to hand drug deal and then stopped him for an apparent traffic violation. He gave a false name, and, when his real name was determined, they found a warrant for him. A search of the car produced a joint. He was strip searched and a plastic bag was taken that was protruding from his anus. The strip search was reasonable. United States v. Broadway, 580 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (D. Colo 2008):

Whether a strip search or body cavity search is “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment “requires a balancing of the need for the particular search against the invasion of personal rights that the search entails. Courts must consider the scope of the particular intrusion, the manner in which it is conducted, the justification for initiating it, and the place in which it is conducted.” Bell, supra, 441 U.S. at 559.

The alleged body cavity search in this case–if it occurred at all–could only have been fleeting and superficial. A review of the videotape shows a combative Defendant. The video shows Detective Gassman attempted a visual inspection of Defendant’s buttocks area, but does not at any time reveal any actual touching, penetration, attempted touching, or attempted penetration of Defendant’s anus or anal cavity. Accordingly, the scope of the search and the manner in which the search was conducted was reasonable.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.