KS: Possession of cash on the person is not PC for a car search

Possession of cash is not probable cause for a vehicle search, but it is a factor to consider in the totality of circumstances. State v. Fitzgerald, 286 Kan. 1124, 192 P.3d 171 (2008). After going through all the factors of the totality and finding them weak:

When the totality of all of these circumstances is considered, as it must be, we conclude that the State did not carry its burden of demonstrating the existence of probable cause to support Thatcher’s initial search of the truck. Of the factors it cites, most are neutral or helpful to the defense, tending to diffuse suspicion rather than enhance it. Those factors that do contribute to probable cause are weak. The district court should not have relied on the probable cause plus exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement to admit the evidence derived from the initial search of the truck.

Officer at least had reasonable suspicion that the defendant was violating the traffic laws, even though it turned out that the defendant didn’t. The stop being justified, everything else flowed from that. State v. Applegate, 2008 UT 63, 194 P.3d 925, 612 Utah Adv. Rep. 28 (2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.