NC: Reasonable suspicion is required for a traffic stop

At least reasonable suspicion is required for a traffic stop (surveying the cases). State v. Styles, 362 N.C. 412, 665 S.E.2d 438 (2008).

There was no apparent authority for an owner of premises to consent to a duffle bag of a guest. When she said it was somebody else’s, the officers were on notice. Motion to suppress should have been granted. Evans v. State, 989 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. App. 5DCA 2008):

Authority cannot be inferred merely from ownership of the house when the searching officer knows the suitcase belongs to the defendant. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d at 865-66. When a third party informs the officer that a closed container belongs to another person, it is not objectively reasonable for the officer, without making further inquiry, to search the container. We conclude that Dorsey’s comment to the officers that the duffle bag belonged to Evans put them on notice to make further inquiry sufficient to establish that she had both common control over the property and mutual use of it. See Marganet, 927 So. 2d at 58 (citing Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.