N.J.: Defendant’s employer could consent to a search of company computer with defendant’s personal files on it

Defendant’s employer could consent to a search of company computer with defendant’s personal files on it. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the computer files. Defendant was suspected of theft from the company, and he was locked out of the office and computer. State v. M.A., 402 N.J. Super. 353, 954 A.2d 503 (2008):

We emphasize that the record is devoid of evidence that defendant claimed ownership or sought return of the computers before the search. To be sure, defendant instituted no legal action for the return of what he claimed was his lawful property. Simply put, he did not do so because he did not own the computers. Braun owned them. Because Braun owned the computers, he had the authority to consent to their search; and because Braun voluntarily consented to the search, the search was valid. …

Our inquiry does not end here. Defendant contends that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the personal information he stored in the computers because he had a private office and placed confidential passwords on the computers to block third party access to that information. …

The evidence establishes that defendant abandoned the computers before the search. Thus, he had no expectation of privacy in them. Nevertheless, we extend our inquiry to consider the merits of his contention. …

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.