CT: Shoes could be seized on arrest

Defendant’s shoes were properly seized on his arrest for fear that they might be disposed of. A shoeprint tied the defendant to the scene of the crime. State v. Fana, 109 Conn. App. 797, 953 A.2d 898 (2008).

Recovery of a DVD from defendant’s person as a search incident for theft of DVDs was proper. Breaston v. State, 893 N.E.2d 6 (Ind. App. 2008).*

Defendant’s stop for a traffic offense led to his fidgeting and relating of impossible travel plans, both of which led the officer to believe defendant was under the influence of drugs. That led to a valid detention to bringing in a dog which alerted. United States v. Hogan, 539 F.3d 916 (8th Cir. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.