WA: Search incident of defendant’s purse was justified by her arrest for refusal to get out of truck

Defendant’s refusal to get out of truck during traffic stop justified arrest for obstruction and a search incident of her purse, even though, if she exited voluntarily, the officer could not have searched it. State v. Zimmer, 146 Wn. App. 405, 190 P.3d 121 (2008):

Ironically, if Zimmer had agreed to Slyter’s request to search the passenger compartment of the truck and exited the truck as requested, Slyter could not have searched her purse. See Id. at 498-99 (officer may not search readily recognizable personal items of non-arrested individuals in vehicle). But because Zimmer did refuse to exit the truck, she was arrested for obstructing justice and Slyter’s lawful search of Zimmer’s purse was incident to her arrest. Moore, 161 Wn.2d at 885. Thus, Slyter’s search of Zimmer’s purse was directly related to her refusal to get out of the truck, the officers’ forcible removal of her from the truck, and her arrest for obstructing justice.

Board of assessors tax assessment dispute required plaintiff to exhibit his property under a particularized discovery order. This did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Roketenetz v. Bd. of Assessors of Lynnfield, 72 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 892 N.E.2d 363 (2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.