GA: Further questions during stop permissible

Further questions of a stopped motorist were valid. Hughes v. State, 293 Ga. App. 404, 667 S.E.2d 163 (2008):

Having de-escalated the traffic stop, police did not need any additional suspicion to ask another unrelated question or to request consent to search. “Even when officers have no basis for suspecting a particular individual, they may generally ask questions of that individual and request consent to search — as long as the police do not convey a message that compliance with their requests is required.” (Punctuation omitted.) Hampton v. State. See Salmeron v. State, supra, 280 Ga. at 736 (1). “[I]f the consent is voluntary, an officer may obtain consent to search a car following the conclusion of a valid traffic stop, without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.” State v. Sims, supra, 248 Ga. App. at 279. Under the circumstances of this case, in which Hughes had been released from the traffic stop, the officers’ request to ask Hughes a question and their subsequent immediate requests to search Hughes’s vehicle and conduct a pat-down were permissible. See Hampton v. State, supra, 287 Ga. App. at 898-899 (1) (affirming denial of a motion to suppress where police requested and received consent to search “immediately” after returning driver’s license and insurance card).

(See Tracey Maclin, Police Interrogation During Traffic Stops: More Questions Than Answers, 31 Champion 34 (Nov. 2007).)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.